1988 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1988 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1988 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1988 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 975 kg more than 1988 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Buick Skyhawk | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Skyhawk | 62 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3300 mm |