1988 Buick Skyhawk vs. 2005 Holden UTE
To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden UTE (204 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1988 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1988 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 420 kg more than 1988 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Buick Skyhawk | 2005 Holden UTE | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | Skyhawk | UTE |
Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2950 mm |