1988 Buick Skylark vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Buick Skylark would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (507 HP) has 359 more horse power than 1988 Buick Skylark. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS should accelerate faster than 1988 Buick Skylark.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Buick Skylark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Buick Skylark. (217 Nm). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Buick Skylark | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
| Make | Buick | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Skylark | CLS |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 507 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 630 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
