1988 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2005 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 180 kg more than 2005 Renault Grand Scenic.
Because 1988 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Cadillac Brougham | 2005 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | Brougham | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5032 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 133 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2690 mm |
