1988 Cadillac Brougham vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,032 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 493 kg more than 2013 Volvo C30.
Because 1988 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Cadillac Brougham | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | Brougham | C30 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5032 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1950 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2039 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2640 mm |