1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1950 Holden FX
To start off, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP) has 72 more horse power than 1950 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1950 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 180 kg more than 1950 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Holden FX is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Holden FX. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 1950 Holden FX | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | Cimarron | FX |
Year Released | 1988 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 51 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |