1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1967 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 152 kg more than 1967 Ford GT 40.
Because 1967 Ford GT 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Ford GT 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 1967 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2842 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 998 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2430 mm |
