1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 123 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Cimarron | 140 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2842 cc | 2127 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |
