1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (115 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Celica weights approximately 15 kg more than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1982 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Cimarron | Celica |
Year Released | 1988 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |