1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 1994 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1994 Ford Aerostar is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 365 kg more than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 1994 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2842 cc | 2978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3030 mm |
