1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2006 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | Cimarron | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2710 mm |