1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (210 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 184 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Because 2009 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Cimarron | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2842 cc | 4009 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
