1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2009 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Eos (200 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 74 kg more than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 2009 Volkswagen Eos | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | Cimarron | Eos |
Year Released | 1988 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1224 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |