1988 Cadillac Cimarron vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 710 kg more than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Cadillac Cimarron | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Cimarron | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2842 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2946 mm |