1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1951 DKW F 89
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 5,012 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 651 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1951 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Camaro | F 89 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5012 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2360 mm |