1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
| Model | Camaro | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 95 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
