1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1965 NSU 1000
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1965 NSU 1000. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1965 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 NSU 1000. (71 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1965 NSU 1000 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
| Model | Camaro | 1000 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |
