1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1966 TVR Griffith
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 5,012 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 TVR Griffith (229 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 TVR Griffith should accelerate faster than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 650 kg more than 1966 TVR Griffith.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1966 TVR Griffith | |
| Make | Chevrolet | TVR |
| Model | Camaro | Griffith |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5012 cc | 4727 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 67 L |
