1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1973 Honda 145
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 145 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1973 Honda 145. (76 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 145.
Because 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Honda 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Honda 145. (123 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Honda 145.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1973 Honda 145 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Camaro | 145 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1432 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |