1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1976 Mazda 616
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 5,012 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 605 kg more than 1976 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (312 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1976 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | 616 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1976 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5012 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 98.3 mm | 78.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 83 mm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2480 mm |