1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1979 Citroen CX
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (107 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX.
Because 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (166 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1979 Citroen CX | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Camaro | CX |
Year Released | 1988 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 87.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3100 mm |