1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1987 Holden Barina
To start off, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Holden Barina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Holden Barina would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1987 Holden Barina. (67 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1987 Holden Barina.
Because 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Holden Barina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Holden Barina. (104 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1987 Holden Barina | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Camaro | Barina |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1987 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 1324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2250 mm |
