1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1992 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1992 Mini MK VI is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1992 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1992 Mini MK VI.
Because 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1992 Mini MK VI | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
| Model | Camaro | MK VI |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2835 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 41 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 68 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2040 mm |
