1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,012 cc (8 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 249 kg more than 1999 Nissan C 52.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (312 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. 1999 Nissan C 52 has automatic transmission and 1988 Chevrolet Camaro has manual transmission. 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan C 52 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | Camaro | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5012 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |
