1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Honda Accord

To start off, 2003 Honda Accord is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda Accord (187 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro.

Because 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Honda Accord. (218 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Honda Accord.

Compare all specifications:

1988 Chevrolet Camaro 2003 Honda Accord
Make Chevrolet Honda
Model Camaro Accord
Year Released 1988 2003
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2835 cc 2360 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 187 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 223 Nm 218 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88.9 mm 87 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 99 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4670 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2680 mm