1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2006 Isuzu KB
To start off, 2006 Isuzu KB is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Isuzu KB. (126 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Isuzu KB. (204 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Isuzu KB.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 2006 Isuzu KB | |
Make | Chevrolet | Isuzu |
Model | Camaro | KB |
Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2835 cc | 2405 cc |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3060 mm |