1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chevrolet Camaro | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
| Model | Camaro | Ultimate 112 |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 223 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1570 mm |
