1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2009 Mazda 6

To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (118 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6.

Because 1988 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chevrolet Camaro (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (165 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 1988 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

1988 Chevrolet Camaro 2009 Mazda 6
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model Camaro 6
Year Released 1988 2009
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2835 cc 1796 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 118 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 223 Nm 165 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 4300 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88.9 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 83.1 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2730 mm