1988 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (266 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (133 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro. (223 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Chevrolet Camaro.

Compare all specifications:

1988 Chevrolet Camaro 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Chevrolet Cadillac
Model Camaro CTS
Year Released 1988 2013
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2835 cc 3000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 133 HP 266 HP
Engine RPM 5100 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 223 Nm 302 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 5700 RPM
Engine Bore Size 88.9 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 80 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4877 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1842 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2880 mm