1988 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1988 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2012 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Epica |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4300 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2700 mm |
