1988 Chrysler Conquest vs. 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Conquest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Conquest would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (230 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1988 Chrysler Conquest. (185 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1988 Chrysler Conquest.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Conquest, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (394 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Chrysler Conquest. (318 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Chrysler Conquest.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Chrysler Conquest | 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | Conquest | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1988 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 4703 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 318 Nm | 394 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2790 mm |