1988 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 2,930 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Holden HD is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Holden HD weights approximately 20 kg more than 1988 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1966 Holden HD is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Holden HD. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chrysler Le Baron | 1966 Holden HD | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Le Baron | HD |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2930 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |
