1988 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,235 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar E Type is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Jaguar E Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar E Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chrysler Le Baron | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Le Baron | E Type |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 63 L |
