1988 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 210 kg more than 1988 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chrysler Le Baron | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Le Baron | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1180 kg | 1390 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2580 mm |
