1988 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1988 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2000 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | Econoline |
Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3510 mm |