1988 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2000 Opel Omega is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 510 kg more than 1988 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2000 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Chrysler | Opel |
| Model | Le Baron | Omega |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3175 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 218 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1710 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 75 L |
