1988 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Acura RL
To start off, 2010 Acura RL is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Acura RL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Acura RL | |
| Make | Chrysler | Acura |
| Model | Le Baron | RL |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4971 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1847 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2799 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 73 L |
