1988 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2002 Suzuki F1

To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Chrysler Voyager (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki F1 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1988 Chrysler Voyager.

Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Chrysler Voyager (183 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1988 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1. 2002 Suzuki F1 has automatic transmission and 1988 Chrysler Voyager has manual transmission. 1988 Chrysler Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki F1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: