1988 Citroen BX vs. 1999 Lincoln LS
To start off, 1999 Lincoln LS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Citroen BX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Citroen BX would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Lincoln LS (211 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1988 Citroen BX. (71 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1988 Citroen BX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Lincoln LS weights approximately 722 kg more than 1988 Citroen BX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Citroen BX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Lincoln LS (278 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Citroen BX. (110 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1999 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Citroen BX.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Citroen BX | 1999 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
Model | BX | LS |
Year Released | 1988 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 278 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1652 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2990 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 68 L |