1988 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (218 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1988 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr should accelerate faster than 1988 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr (271 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Citroen CX. (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Citroen CX. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr has automatic transmission and 1988 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1988 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Citroen CX | 2006 Lincoln Zephyr | |
Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
Model | CX | Zephyr |
Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 218 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 66 L |