1988 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,964 cc, 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1988 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1988 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Citroen CX weights approximately 415 kg more than 2006 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (270 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Citroen CX. (160 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Citroen CX | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 6 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2964 cc |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |