1988 Citroen CX vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,165 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1988 Citroen CX. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1988 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Citroen CX. (177 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Citroen CX | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | CX | Epica |
Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2165 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 177 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |