1988 Daihatsu Rocky vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Daihatsu Rocky. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Daihatsu Rocky would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (271 HP) has 199 more horse power than 1988 Daihatsu Rocky. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1988 Daihatsu Rocky.
Because 1988 Daihatsu Rocky is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Jaguar XF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Daihatsu Rocky will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (600 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Daihatsu Rocky. (170 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Daihatsu Rocky.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Daihatsu Rocky | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Jaguar |
| Model | Rocky | XF |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2765 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 271 HP |
| Torque | 170 Nm | 600 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4110 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2908 mm |
