1988 Dodge Colt vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1988 Dodge Colt is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Dodge Colt (87 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Dodge Colt weights approximately 722 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Colt | Seven |
Year Released | 1988 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2240 mm |