1988 Dodge Colt vs. 1973 Holden UTE
To start off, 1988 Dodge Colt is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Holden UTE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Holden UTE would be higher. At 5,047 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Holden UTE (240 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Colt. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Colt.
Because 1973 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Holden UTE (427 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 235 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Dodge Colt. (192 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1973 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 1973 Holden UTE | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Colt | UTE |
Year Released | 1988 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 5047 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |