1988 Dodge Colt vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 1988 Dodge Colt is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Dodge Colt (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Dodge Colt weights approximately 58 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Dodge Colt (192 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (150 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1988 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Dodge Colt | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Dodge | Opel |
| Model | Colt | Ascona |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 192 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1072 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2600 mm |
