1988 Dodge Colt vs. 1998 Ford Puma
To start off, 1998 Ford Puma is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,467 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Ford Puma (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Ford Puma should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Ford Puma weights approximately 15 kg more than 1988 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Ford Puma (125 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1998 Ford Puma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 1998 Ford Puma | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Colt | Puma |
Year Released | 1988 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1467 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2450 mm |