1988 Dodge Colt vs. 2001 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2001 Mercury Cougar is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 2,543 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercury Cougar (196 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 212 kg more than 1988 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercury Cougar (228 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 2001 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Colt | Cougar |
Year Released | 1988 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2543 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1407 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2710 mm |