1988 Dodge Colt vs. 2002 Ford Ka
To start off, 2002 Ford Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Ka (135 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Colt. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Ka weights approximately 6 kg more than 1988 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Dodge Colt (192 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Ka. (175 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1988 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 2002 Ford Ka | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Colt | Ka |
Year Released | 1988 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 192 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1136 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2450 mm |