1988 Dodge Colt vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1988 Dodge Colt. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1988 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Compass weights approximately 411 kg more than 1988 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 Dodge Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Dodge Colt | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Colt | Compass |
Year Released | 1988 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1467 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 123 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2660 mm |